Here is another example of liberals blaming everything they are against on the influence of the evil Evangelical Christians. It is never the fault of the perpetrators. The blame is always passed on to someone else. More often than not, it is the "Religious Right" or "Evangelical Christians." I am sure that you could probably find someone who would tell you that Jack the Ripper was an Evangelical Christian. We already know the the Hitler of the 21st century, George W. Bush is one. I am certain that the criminals mentioned in my earlier posts were probably card-carrying members of the Moral Majority too.
You can brutally murder someone, kidnap and murder children, or commit just about any unspeakable crime against your fellow humans and you can always find someone to stand up for your rights and be willing to make sure that you have cable television and the religiously appropriate diet while you are incarcerated. But, if you want to actually punish one of these criminals who are now just victims of the evil and unjust legal system. You are Satan himself. Please note that I said legal system and not justice system. There is no justice.
It seems that the anti-death penalty folks don't mind keeping this vicious criminals alive at taxpayer expense indefinitely. Maybe if we put it into terms they can understand. How many children could be educated for the cost of keeping one inmate for a year? For example, California spends $35,587 per year per inmate as noted on their website.
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN0730247320070813
CA Dept of Corrections :http://www.cdcr.ca.gov/DivisionsBoards/AOAP/FactsFigures.html
Monday, August 13, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Well, in a way I'd have to say it probably IS in large part due to the influence of Christians - at least the ones who understand what true justice means. Difference of opinion about the outcome aside, I think the author pretty accurately assess the "why" of the situation. Which begs the question: "Why is this a news article and not an editorial". It is at best "commentary". Hardly a "who", "what", "when" and "where" sort of deal.
Post a Comment